Expect Gov. Hochul’s new Parole Board picks to keep letting cop-killers walk free
New York Governor Kathy Hochul has been facing criticism for her approach to the state’s Parole Board, with concerns that she is not taking steps to address the pro-criminal bias within the board. Despite efforts to undo some of the state’s worst criminal justice policies, Hochul’s recent appointments to the Parole Board have raised eyebrows.
During the recent legislative session, the Senate quietly confirmed four of Hochul’s nominees to the board. While two of these appointments were meant to fill longstanding vacancies, the other two were aimed at replacing members appointed by former Governor Andrew Cuomo, whose terms had already expired. The fact that Cuomo’s picks still constituted a majority of the board highlights the lack of initiative from Hochul to assert her own influence on the board.
The composition of the Parole Board has been a contentious issue, with concerns about its leniency towards criminals. Over the past eight years, the board has approved the release of at least 43 individuals convicted of killing police officers. One recent case that garnered attention was the potential release of David McClary, the gang member convicted of assassinating Police Officer Edward Byrne in 1988. The board postponed a decision on McClary’s release until after the Democratic mayoral primary, leading to speculation about political motivations.
Hochul’s recent appointments to the Parole Board do not seem likely to shift its pro-criminal stance. The appointees include individuals with backgrounds in public defense, community services, defense law, and law enforcement. Despite their diverse backgrounds, the Senate’s reluctance to confirm nominees who might take a tougher stance on parole decisions suggests that the board’s dynamics are unlikely to change.
The political landscape in New York has seen a shift towards progressive policies, with lawmakers making it easier for individuals to qualify for parole and stay out of prison for parole violations. Hochul’s signing of the “Less is More” law in 2021 further emphasized the state’s lenient approach to parole decisions.
Critics argue that Hochul’s failure to address the issues within the Parole Board reflects a larger trend of her reluctance to challenge progressive agendas. As the board continues to release convicted criminals, including cop-killers, there is growing concern among New York voters about the need for stronger support for law and order.
Ultimately, the controversy surrounding the Parole Board highlights the ongoing debate over criminal justice reform in New York and the need for leadership that prioritizes public safety and accountability. As the state grapples with these complex issues, it remains to be seen how Hochul will navigate the delicate balance between progressive policies and public safety concerns.



