Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg scored comp tickets to 17 swanky galas last year, many by lefty groups
Soft-on-crime Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has come under fire for accepting free tickets worth over $9,400 to attend 17 high-profile events last year. The majority of these events were hosted by left-leaning organizations that have contracts with the city, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest.
Among the events Bragg attended were the NYC Police Foundation’s gala at the Intrepid Museum, where tickets cost at least $2,500 each, and a gathering by the Center for Alternatives Sentencing and Employment Services in Brooklyn. While some of the events were not directly tied to city business, such as the “Keepers of the Dream” gala hosted by Rev. Al Sharpton’s National Action Network, many were sponsored by organizations with city contracts.
Critics have pointed out that as Manhattan’s lead prosecutor, Bragg should avoid cozying up to groups that advocate for a “woke” social justice agenda. Republican candidate Maud Maron, who is running against Bragg, criticized his acceptance of complimentary gifts from businesses doing business with the city. Maron accused Bragg of spending time with the moneyed elite while neglecting his duty to make the streets safer for all New Yorkers.
Bragg’s opponents, including independent candidate Diana Florence, have accused him of prioritizing social engagements over public safety. Florence argued that Bragg’s lenient approach to crime has made the city more dangerous for law-abiding citizens. Bragg’s spokesperson, Danielle Filson, defended his attendance at these events, stating that he disclosed his support for various charitable organizations relevant to his office.
Despite the criticism, Filson dismissed the allegations as a smear campaign against Bragg’s record of keeping Manhattan safe. She emphasized that his predecessors and fellow district attorneys have also attended similar events in the past. As the debate over Bragg’s conduct continues, the public remains divided on whether his social engagements are appropriate for a top law enforcement official.
