Menendez Brothers Demand Los Angeles D.A. Recuse Himself Due to ‘Gaslighting’

The Menendez brothers, Lyle and Erik, have recently made a bold move in their quest for a new trial or resentencing by filing a motion to disqualify the office of the District Attorney from participating in the proceedings. The 160-page filing argues that there is a conflict that makes it unlikely for the brothers to receive a fair resentencing hearing, thus justifying the need for recusal.

The case of the Menendez brothers, who have spent 35 years in prison for the brutal murders of their parents in 1989, has seen its fair share of developments in the past few months. Former District Attorney George Gascón initially sought to reduce their sentence from life without parole to 50 years to life, making them eligible for parole. However, after Gascón lost the election, newly elected D.A. Nathan Hochman reversed this decision, leading to a significant shift in the case.

The motion filed by the brothers’ lawyers highlights various conflicts involving Hochman, including his interactions with Kathleen Cady, the lawyer representing Milton Andersen, the only family member opposing resentencing. The motion raises concerns about the lack of alignment between the views of the Menendez family and the new District Attorney, pointing to possible bias in the proceedings.

Mark Geragos, an attorney for the brothers, criticized the D.A.’s handling of the case, describing it as “next level gaslighting.” The filing also criticizes the D.A. for not consulting with all family members to understand their views on resentencing, further emphasizing the need for a fair and impartial process.

The high-profile nature of the Menendez brothers’ case has attracted significant media attention over the years, with several film and TV adaptations being produced. The latest developments in the case, including the postponement of a hearing to consider parole board assessments and a formal complaint filed by the Menendez family regarding the display of graphic crime scene photos, have added further complexity to the legal proceedings.

In light of these recent events, the motion filed by the Menendez brothers’ legal team underscores the importance of a fair resentencing process for both the brothers and the victims’ families. It calls for recusal of the District Attorney’s office to ensure that all parties receive fair treatment and that the public perceives the legal proceedings as just and unbiased. The ongoing legal battle surrounding the Menendez brothers’ case continues to unfold, with the outcome remaining uncertain.