Iran war makes things personal for veteran candidates

The recent U.S.-Israel war with Iran has brought to light the differing perspectives and experiences of military veterans running for Congress. From Democrats like Virginia state Del. Dan Helmer, who view the conflict as a reckless military intervention without clear strategic goals, to Republicans like Michigan House candidate Michael Bouchard, who see it as a necessary mission against a long-standing regional threat, the candidates’ personal experiences and beliefs shape their stance on the war.

For many of these candidates, the costs and imperatives of war hit close to home. New York Assemblymember Robert Smullen, a Marine veteran, has firsthand knowledge of the region’s complexities, having done multiple Strait of Hormuz transits. Montana Democrat Matt Rains, who flew Black Hawks in Iraq, is also feeling the impact of rising diesel costs on his ranch. Zach Dembo, a former Navy JAG officer, has served on aircraft carriers now deployed to the Middle East, giving him a unique perspective on the conflict.

While there is some agreement among the candidates on opposing the autocratic Iranian government, there is little consensus on the best course of action. Democrats criticize President Trump for not making a clear case for war and lacking a coherent strategy, fearing that the conflict will lead to another endless war with no clear endgame. On the other hand, Republicans align with Trump’s messaging, emphasizing the need to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and trusting the president to achieve that goal.

As these veteran candidates navigate their campaigns during wartime, they hope to leverage their military experience to speak authoritatively on national security issues. Democrats aim to highlight the flaws of the war and address domestic economic concerns, while Republicans seek to reassure voters about the success of U.S. strikes and the importance of national security.

In the midst of a complex and rapidly changing conflict, these veteran candidates offer a unique perspective that could resonate with voters as they navigate the crowded primaries and swing districts. Whether it’s Democrats emphasizing national security expertise or Republicans advocating for swift action against threats, these candidates hope to make a difference in Congress during this critical time.