Smithsonian chief disputes scathing White House report accusing museum of ‘radical’ activism
The Smithsonian Museum of American History has found itself at the center of controversy following a scathing report released by the White House on July 4. The report accused the museum and its leaders of presenting a “radical view” of American history, sparking a response from Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch.
In an internal letter to staff obtained by ABC News, Bunch disputed the findings of the report, stating that the Smithsonian’s work is driven by scholarship, accuracy, and a commitment to telling the full story of America. He emphasized the institution’s dedication to excellence, reflection, and growth, and reassured staff members of their crucial role in helping the nation understand its history.
The White House report, which accused the Smithsonian of engaging in “extreme political activism” and promoting divisive narratives, particularly targeted the National Museum of American History. The report alleged that the museum’s leadership had adopted an ideological framework that undermined the shared national heritage of America.
Despite these allegations, the Smithsonian spokesperson reaffirmed the institution’s commitment to impartial learning and independent scholarship. The White House review of the Smithsonian was initiated in response to an executive order by President Donald Trump, directing the removal of what was deemed as improper ideology from federal cultural institutions.
The report’s claims have been met with criticism from the American Historical Association, which represents historians across various institutions, including the Smithsonian. The AHA has defended the Smithsonian’s approach to historical content and urged the White House to respect the expertise of museum professionals in curating exhibits.
As the debate over the Smithsonian’s portrayal of American history continues, Secretary Bunch’s letter underscores the institution’s dedication to its mission and the importance of preserving a comprehensive and accurate narrative of the nation’s past. The internal and external reviews of the Smithsonian’s exhibits and processes remain ongoing, with implications for how history is presented in federal cultural institutions.



