Residents fight 800-acre Crowsnest annexation in Castle Pines

The movement to oppose a proposed 3,650-home mixed-use project near Castle Pines is gaining momentum in a suburban county known for its rapid growth. Residents of this affluent Douglas County city, along with the mayors of neighboring Parker and Castle Rock, are concerned that the 800-acre Crowsnest annexation request would lead to an overly dense development that does not align with the area’s peaceful character.

Negotiations between the developer, VT Crowfoot Valley Landco LLC, and Castle Pines are ongoing. The developer recently adjusted the project parameters, reducing the number of homes to 3,646 and increasing the amount of open space. The developer is expected to submit its fifth revision of the proposal to the city soon.

A group called People Against Annexing Crowsnest has launched a website to voice their opposition to the project, citing concerns about the development’s impact on existing taxpayers and the area’s natural surroundings. VT Crowfoot Valley Landco, a limited liability company formed recently, is behind the project and has faced challenges with its proposed "flagpole" annexation approach.

While the Castle Pines City Council has deemed the Crowsnest property eligible for annexation under state law, a final vote is not expected until late April. Opponents of the project are prepared to fight, including the possibility of a ballot measure to reverse any city approval. Concerns about water supply, traffic, and wildlife impacts have been raised by residents and officials alike.

The developer argues that the Crowsnest project would contribute significantly to the local economy, generating revenue and providing commercial space. However, critics question the project’s compatibility with the surrounding communities and its potential strain on infrastructure and resources.

As the debate continues, residents like Irene Bonham express concerns about the loss of the area’s natural beauty and wildlife habitats. Despite the region’s history of growth and development, some residents feel that the proposed project may compromise the unique character of the area.

Overall, the opposition to the Crowsnest project reflects a broader conversation about balancing growth and preservation in rapidly expanding communities. The outcome of the annexation request will have significant implications for Castle Pines and its neighboring towns.

Key Points:

1. Residents and officials in Douglas County are opposing a proposed 3,650-home development near Castle Pines.
2. Concerns about density, infrastructure, and environmental impact have fueled opposition to the Crowsnest project.
3. The developer has made revisions to the proposal, but opposition groups are determined to fight against the annexation.
4. The debate highlights the tension between growth and preservation in rapidly expanding communities.
5. The outcome of the annexation request will have significant implications for the area’s future development.