New York Times went from self-appointed #MeToo beacon to sympathetic portrayal of Epstein’s enablers: sources

Following her involvement in the #MeToo movement, the New York Times is facing criticism for giving a sympathetic platform to Kathryn Ruemmler, an ally of Jeffrey Epstein and former Obama White House Counsel.

Ruemmler, who was once named as an executor of Epstein’s will but later distanced herself, claims she was not fully aware of his criminal activities over the years.

In an interview published in the Opinion section on June 11, Ruemmler is portrayed as “oddly naive” and someone navigating the competitive world of big law.

The piece generated controversy within the Times newsroom, with some sources calling it a “joke” and “embarrassing.”

The Times has extensively covered Ruemmler’s connections to Epstein, including the gifts he gave her and their correspondence revealed in DOJ documents.

Nathan Werksman, an attorney representing Epstein victims, criticized the Times for downplaying accountability for figures like Ruemmler.

Ruemmler claimed she never would have associated with Epstein if she knew the extent of his crimes, stating that she regrets legitimizing his reputation.

Despite the sympathetic portrayal in the Times interview, Ruemmler’s ties to Epstein have drawn scrutiny and raised questions about her judgment.

Overall, the Times’ handling of Ruemmler’s story has sparked controversy and divided opinions within the media industry.

For more updates and insights, stay tuned to our platform for the latest news and analysis.