More than a third of shoplifting defendants on ankle monitors have gone missing, data shows
Cook County Chief Judge Charles Beach II recently released startling data regarding the number of defendants on electronic monitoring who have gone missing in Cook County. According to the report, more than one-third of individuals on electronic monitoring for shoplifting cases and a quarter of robbery defendants have disappeared. This information is part of Beach’s initiative to revamp the county’s ankle monitor program and enhance its transparency.
The report highlights that out of the 244 missing defendants, approximately 24% were on electronic monitoring for domestic-related charges. Shoplifters make up a significant portion of the missing individuals, with 24 people charged with shoplifting having gone AWOL. This accounts for a third of the total number of individuals on ankle monitors for shoplifting cases. Additionally, burglars and individuals charged with battery have above-average disappearance rates, with 15% and 27% respectively escaping while awaiting trial.
Furthermore, judges have placed robbers on ankle monitors, with a 23% disappearance rate among this group. However, if the robberies involved a weapon, the disappearance rate drops to 9%. The data also indicates a 23% failure rate of ankle monitors for auto theft defendants. Surprisingly, out of the 19 individuals charged with attempted murder on electronic monitoring, only one remains unaccounted for.
Judge Beach has prioritized addressing the issues within the electronic monitoring program since taking office in December. This initiative was prompted by public outrage following a high-profile case involving a man on ankle monitoring who committed a violent crime. Beach’s proposed reforms include stricter violation thresholds and increased judicial oversight to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.
Despite these efforts, challenges persist within the system. An individual named Alphonso Talley, a repeat felon on pretrial release for serious offenses, managed to evade monitoring and commit a heinous crime. This incident underscored the need for improved transparency and accountability within the program.
In response to these events, Beach has committed to enhancing transparency by regularly disclosing escape data and providing updates on missing individuals. This transparency effort aims to hold the system accountable and prevent future tragedies from occurring.
As Beach continues to address the shortcomings of the electronic monitoring program, it is crucial to prioritize the safety and security of the community. By implementing necessary reforms and maintaining transparency, Cook County can work towards a more effective and reliable monitoring system.



